The key thing is that we want to empower teachers to look at data and make it their own, to take teaching and learning forward.Melisha Trotman, Primary School Principal
Annual testing with the PT Series highlights students needing support or extension
The data allows the school to evaluate the effectiveness of teaching interventions
The data can help identify staff CPD needs
The British School, New Delhi is a top international, multicultural school with around 1,200 students representing more than 55 nationalities. The school follows the National Curriculum for England, adapted for the Indian context, with students studying for IGCSE and the IB Diploma Programme (DP).
The primary school educates around 550 children, ranging from age 3 to 11. High expectations, coupled with a caring and purposeful ethos, help ensure that the students develop the academic and social skills necessary to prepare them for life-long learning. Benchmarking and measuring progress is an important part of this.
Melisha Trotman, Primary School Principal, tells us more: ‘We were looking for an assessment that would allow us to see progress in learning and identify any gaps in children’s knowledge. I was also keen to identify any training needs and CPD opportunities for the staff and provide a picture of whether learning was progressing and gain insights into how we can increase rates of progress for the children.’
Building a complete picture of every child
The school began using GL Education’s Progress Test Series (PT Series) in 2016. Roopshree Chauhan Marwah, Assessment Co-ordinator at the school, explains more:
‘We use the PT Series at the end of each academic year – online for Years 3, 4, 5 and 6 and paper-based for Years 1 and 2. We review the data and use it as a baseline when the children move up to the next year group. Their new teachers have the children with them for around a month before we run class review meetings. They are able to triangulate the PT Series data with their own classroom observations and children’s work, as well as attendance and medical records, to build a rounded picture and identify if there are any red flags. We identify any children who either need extra support or extension, and then work out a progress path for each child.’
The data came into its own in the second year of use, when the team could clearly see whether progress had been made – or where students had perhaps slipped back.
Melisha explains, ‘The data allowed us to see issues that we weren’t even thinking of – we were able to ask, ‘Why has this child slipped back’, then we could look at the wider picture and see, for example, that the child had 70% attendance. It meant that we were able to identify issues of attendance and punctuality and were able to put in programmes of support for that.’
Roopshree goes on: ‘The PT Series data helps us to develop a complete picture of every child – and steers personalised learning. We’re able to see progress across the year, rates of progress, and what the impact of new interventions are. It also gives us the opportunity to base our discussions around the data – providing concrete evidence and equipping teachers with more understanding of the students.’
Comparing Progress Test scores year on year provides the school with a benchmarked measure of progress for each student
Encouraging teachers to engage with data
The senior team put in place a system of structured training for the staff, to ensure that they were making the most of the data that was being generated.
Roopshree explains: ‘Data can be daunting, but this gave us the opportunity to spread assessment literacy amongst the staff, encouraging them to look at data and really use it in their class. We gave teachers the tools to read the data and showed them how to use it to make their teaching more impactful and how to use it to enhance learning.
Before the class review meetings, the Primary Leadership Team (PLT) walked the teachers through how to conduct a class review. We had one-to-one sessions where we took them step-by-step through what the data could show – looking at, for example, the children that had made the least progress that year, rather than just the raw scores in a ranking. It opened their eyes to how powerful that could be.
The teachers this year now can’t wait to get their hands on the data – and they’ll be able to unpick it and show us that they can use the data more effectively.‘
Using data to show the impact of new resources and interventions
Using Progress Test in Maths data, the school identified that, although the children were very capable, the progress rates weren’t where they should be, and potential wasn’t being maximised.
Melisha explains: ‘We were able to analyse the data and see where changes might need to be made. In Maths, we felt that we could benefit from a mastery programme and have just started using a new mastery resource. It’ll be interesting next year to be able to see what the progress rates in Maths are, so that we can gauge the impact.
We also introduced a new reading programme lower down the school, as we have lots of English as an Additional Language (EAL) learners. That’s been shown by the data to have had a significant impact.
It’s been running for around 18 months now and the data demonstrates the impact and effectiveness of it. By the end of Year 1, every child is reading.’
Having a whole-school impact
The school also looked at the more able and wanted to increase the number of students working at greater depth in English. These were identified as students achieving a Standard Age Score (SAS) of 105 and above in Progress Test in English.
Following whole school professional development, the numbers rose from 27% of students achieving SAS 105 or above at the end of 2016-17, to 41% at the end of 2017-18.
Melisha explains: ‘The data showed that the slowest progress was often being made by the highest achievers, so we knew that we needed to challenge the higher level. This was something that we saw throughout the school, so we were able to act quickly. We brought in a trainer from the UK who led some high impact training in reading and writing for the staff. This has had a marked impact and we’ve seen significant progress in the students and in the confidence of the teachers to teach those students too.‘
‘Similarly, with supporting our EAL students – we could see that some teachers were struggling. So we got our EAL department to run a series of training sessions, giving the teachers the tools and skills they need.’
Roopshree goes on: ‘We also encourage teachers to share best practice. From the data we can see which classes are stronger in a particular area. So, for example, if we saw that a class had high scores in one area, we were able to encourage other teachers to go and observe the lessons from that teacher or have a dedicated time where the teachers could share the strategies they employ in their classes with colleagues who would benefit.’
Using data for literacy intervention
A large proportion of the students at Edubridge have English as an Additional Language (EAL), so the team were aware that literacy was an area that they wanted to look at specifically.
Students who were identified by CAT4 as having a lower verbal ability were further investigated using NGRT. Comparisons of different factors such as sentence completion, comprehension etc helped to differentiate between EAL students and those who may have other literacy support needs. These students were then investigated further using the York Assessment of Reading for Comprehension (YARC) to identify any specific problems and inform appropriate interventions.
Tassos explains: ‘The tests showed that whilst spoken skills were generally good, reading comprehension levels were low. The Literacy Co-ordinator was able to implement literacy plans, based on the results of NGRT and YARC, supporting early and effective intervention.
We ran after-school literacy groups that were directed by the test results, that have proven to be very effective. Suggested literacy strategies for teachers to use in their day-to-day teaching were also developed, including a Drop Everything and Read campaign, as well as Drop Everything and Write. We discovered that the impact of raising literacy could happen very quickly, as they’re all very aspirational students.’